The 2017 Chevrolet Equinox is currently rated #6 out of 12 overall in its category, beaten by the 2017 Ford Escape for Compact SUV Cars.
It's a good car overall compared to others in the same category and beats more than half of its competition along the way.
Its Horsepower and MPG win versus competitors, but its Motor Trend Overall Rating loses against the competition.
The Equinox costs $1,810.00 less than the RAV4. After a comparison of the two based on their attributes, our voters rated it is losing in a head to head match up.
The Equinox costs $650.00 less than the Escape. You have a chance to be the first to compare the two against each other.
The Equinox costs $720.00 less than the Rogue. You have a chance to be the first to compare the two against each other.
The Equinox costs $505.00 more than the Forester. You have a chance to be the first to compare the two against each other.
The Equinox costs $100.00 less than the Sportage. You have a chance to be the first to compare the two against each other.
The Equinox costs $970.00 less than the Terrain. You have a chance to be the first to compare the two against each other.
The Equinox costs $400.00 more than the Tucson. You have a chance to be the first to compare the two against each other.
The Equinox costs $945.00 less than the CX-5. You have a chance to be the first to compare the two against each other.
The Equinox costs $945.00 less than the CR-V. After a comparison of the two based on their attributes, our voters rated it is winning in a head to head match up.
The Equinox costs $1,405.00 more than the Crosstrek. You have a chance to be the first to compare the two against each other.
The Equinox costs $5,060.00 more than the Patriot. Based on a comparison of the attributes, people rated both as tied in a head to head match up.
Rating | Feature | Value | Analysis |
---|---|---|---|
MSRP | $23,100.00 | Average with 2.5 stars based on ratings | |
MPG | 21 city / 31 highway city / highway | Good with 3 stars based on ratings | |
Drivetrain | FWD/AWD | Average with 2.5 stars based on ratings | |
Horsepower | 182hp | Good with 3.5 stars based on ratings | |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 18.8 galgal | Good with 3 stars based on ratings | |
Cargo Volume | 31.5cubic ft w/ seats in use, 63.7 w/o | Average with 2.5 stars based on ratings | |
Seating Capacity | 5. Seating is good overall. | Average with 2.5 stars based on ratings | |
Motor Trend Overall Rating | 3/5 | Bad with 1.5 stars based on ratings |