The 2017 Ford Escape is currently rated #5 out of 12 overall in its category, beaten by the 2017 Hyundai Tucson for Compact SUV Cars.
It's a good car overall compared to others in the same category and beats more than half of its competition along the way.
Its Drivetrain and Fuel Tank Capacity win versus competitors, but its MPG loses against the competition.
The Escape costs $1,160.00 less than the RAV4. From comparing their attributes, our survey rated it is winning in a head to head match up.
The Escape costs $650.00 more than the Equinox. You have a chance to be the first to compare the two against each other.
The Escape costs $70.00 less than the Rogue. You have a chance to be the first to compare the two against each other.
The Escape costs $1,155.00 more than the Forester. After a comparison of the two based on their attributes, our voters rated it is losing in a head to head match up.
The Escape costs $550.00 more than the Sportage. You have a chance to be the first to compare the two against each other.
The Escape costs $320.00 less than the Terrain. You have a chance to be the first to compare the two against each other.
The Escape costs $1,050.00 more than the Tucson. You have a chance to be the first to compare the two against each other.
The Escape costs $295.00 less than the CX-5. From comparing their attributes, our survey rated it is winning in a head to head match up.
The Escape costs $295.00 less than the CR-V. From comparing their attributes, our survey rated it is winning in a head to head match up.
The Escape costs $2,055.00 more than the Crosstrek. You have a chance to be the first to compare the two against each other.
The Escape costs $5,710.00 more than the Patriot. After a comparison of the two based on their attributes, our voters rated it is winning in a head to head match up.
Rating | Feature | Value | Analysis |
---|---|---|---|
MSRP | $23,750.00 | Good with 4 stars based on ratings | |
MPG | 23 city / 30 highway city / highway | Bad with 1.5 stars based on ratings | |
Drivetrain | FWD/4WD | Good with 5 stars based on ratings | |
Horsepower | 168 to 245hp | Average with 2.5 stars based on ratings | |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 15.7 galgal | Good with 4 stars based on ratings | |
Cargo Volume | 34cubic ft w/ seats in use, 68 w/o | Good with 3.5 stars based on ratings | |
Seating Capacity | 5. Front seats good, rear seats not the biggest. | Average with 2.5 stars based on ratings | |
Motor Trend Overall Rating | 3/5 | Bad with 2 stars based on ratings | |
Driver/Passenger Interior | Average with 2.5 stars based on ratings |