The 2017 Hyundai Tucson is currently rated #4 out of 12 overall in its category, beaten by the 2017 Subaru Crosstrek for Compact SUV Cars.
It's a good car overall compared to others in the same category and beats more than half of its competition along the way.
Its MSRP and Cargo Volume win versus competitors, but its Motor Trend Overall Rating loses against the competition.
The Tucson costs $2,210.00 less than the RAV4. You have a chance to be the first to compare the two against each other.
The Tucson costs $1,050.00 less than the Escape. You have a chance to be the first to compare the two against each other.
The Tucson costs $400.00 less than the Equinox. You have a chance to be the first to compare the two against each other.
The Tucson costs $1,120.00 less than the Rogue. You have a chance to be the first to compare the two against each other.
The Tucson costs $105.00 more than the Forester. After a comparison of the two based on their attributes, our voters rated it is losing in a head to head match up.
The Tucson costs $500.00 less than the Sportage. Based on a comparison of the attributes, people rated it is winning in a head to head match up.
The Tucson costs $1,370.00 less than the Terrain. You have a chance to be the first to compare the two against each other.
The Tucson costs $1,345.00 less than the CX-5. After a comparison of the two based on their attributes, our voters rated it is winning in a head to head match up.
The Tucson costs $1,345.00 less than the CR-V. Based on a comparison of the attributes, people rated it is losing in a head to head match up.
The Tucson costs $1,005.00 more than the Crosstrek. Based on a comparison of the attributes, people rated both as tied in a head to head match up.
The Tucson costs $4,660.00 more than the Patriot. You have a chance to be the first to compare the two against each other.
Rating | Feature | Value | Analysis |
---|---|---|---|
MSRP | $22,700.00 | Good with 4.5 stars based on ratings | |
MPG | 26 city / 32 highway city / highway | Good with 3 stars based on ratings | |
Drivetrain | FWD/AWD | Bad with 0 stars based on rating | |
Horsepower | 164 to 175hp | Bad with 1 stars based on ratings | |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 16.4 galgal | Average with 2.5 stars based on ratings | |
Cargo Volume | 31cubic ft w/ seats in use, 61.9 w/o | Good with 4 stars based on ratings | |
Seating Capacity | 5. All seats spacious | Bad with 2 stars based on ratings | |
Motor Trend Overall Rating | 4/5 | Bad with 0 stars based on rating |