Jaguar F-Pace

2017 Jaguar F-Pace

Rating Summary

The 2017 Jaguar F-Pace is currently rated #4 out of 4 overall in its category, beaten by the 2017 Porsche Macan for Luxury Compact SUV Cars.

It's a bad car overall compared to others in the same category.

Its Driver/Passenger Interior lose against competitors.

Competitors

Which is better: Jaguar F-Pace or Acura RDX?

The F-Pace costs $6,320.00 more than the RDX. After a comparison of the two based on their attributes, our voters rated it is losing in a head to head match up.

Compare the two against eachother

Which is better: Jaguar F-Pace or BMW X3?

The F-Pace costs $1,940.00 more than the X3. You have a chance to be the first to compare the two against each other.

Compare the two against eachother

Which is better: Jaguar F-Pace or Porsche Macan?

The F-Pace costs $5,510.00 less than the Macan. You have a chance to be the first to compare the two against each other.

Compare the two against eachother

2017 Jaguar F-Pace Details

Is This Car Good?
Overall Rating

Best Attribute
Driver/Passenger Interior

Worst Attribute
Seating Capacity

Rating Feature Value Analysis
MSRP$41,990.00Bad with 0 stars based on rating
MPG18 city / 23 highwayBad with 0 stars based on rating
DrivetrainAWDBad with 0 stars based on rating
Horsepower180 to 380 hp
Towing Capacity5,290 lbs
Cargo Volume33.5 cubic ft
Seating Capacity5. Comfortable and spacious. Not as much headroom as Posche Macan or BMW X5Bad with 0 stars based on rating
Motor Trend Overall Rating4/5
Side ProfileSide Profile
Driver/Passenger InteriorDriver/Passenger InteriorAverage with 2.5 stars based on ratings