Jaguar F-Pace

2017 Jaguar F-Pace

Rating Summary

The 2017 Jaguar F-Pace is currently rated #4 out of 4 overall in its category, beaten by the 2017 Porsche Macan for Luxury Compact SUV Cars.

It's a bad car overall compared to others in the same category.

Its MSRP lose against competitors.

Competitors

Which is better: Jaguar F-Pace or Acura RDX?

The F-Pace costs $6,320.00 more than the RDX. After a comparison of the two based on their attributes, our voters rated it is losing in a head to head match up.

Compare the two against eachother

Which is better: Jaguar F-Pace or BMW X3?

The F-Pace costs $1,940.00 more than the X3. You have a chance to be the first to compare the two against each other.

Compare the two against eachother

Which is better: Jaguar F-Pace or Porsche Macan?

The F-Pace costs $5,510.00 less than the Macan. You have a chance to be the first to compare the two against each other.

Compare the two against eachother

2017 Jaguar F-Pace Details

Is This Car Good?
Overall Rating

Best Attribute
MSRP

Worst Attribute
Seating Capacity

Rating Feature Value Analysis
MSRP$41,990.00Bad with 0 stars based on 1 ratings
MPG18 city / 23 highwayBad with 0 stars based on 1 ratings
DrivetrainAWDBad with 0 stars based on 1 ratings
Horsepower180 to 380 hp
Towing Capacity5,290 lbs
Cargo Volume33.5 cubic ft
Seating Capacity5. Comfortable and spacious. Not as much headroom as Posche Macan or BMW X5Bad with 0 stars based on 1 ratings
Motor Trend Overall Rating4/5
Side ProfileSide Profile
Driver/Passenger InteriorDriver/Passenger InteriorBad with 0 stars based on 1 ratings