2017 Jaguar F-Pace

2017 Jaguar F-Pace

Summary

vs. The Competition

The 2017 Jaguar F-Pace is currently rated #4 out of 4 overall in its category, beaten by the 2017 Acura RDX for Luxury Compact SUV Cars.

It's a bad car overall compared to others in the same category.

Its Driver/Passenger Interior lose against competitors.

Competitors

Which is better: Jaguar F-Pace or Acura RDX?

The F-Pace costs $6,320.00 more than the RDX. From comparing their attributes, our survey rated it is losing in a head to head match up.

Compare the two against eachother

Which is better: Jaguar F-Pace or BMW X3?

The F-Pace costs $1,940.00 more than the X3. You have a chance to be the first to compare the two against each other.

Compare the two against eachother

Which is better: Jaguar F-Pace or Porsche Macan?

The F-Pace costs $5,510.00 less than the Macan. You have a chance to be the first to compare the two against each other.

Compare the two against eachother

2017 Jaguar F-Pace Specs & Details

Is This Car Good?
Overall Rating

Best Attribute
Driver/Passenger Interior

Worst Attribute
Seating Capacity

Rating Feature Value Analysis
MSRP$41,990.00Bad with 0 stars based on rating
MPG18 city / 23 highway city / highwayBad with 0 stars based on rating
DrivetrainAWDBad with 0 stars based on rating
Horsepower180 to 380hp
Towing Capacity5,290 lbs
Cargo Volume33.5 cubic ft
Seating Capacity5. Comfortable and spacious. Not as much headroom as Posche Macan or BMW X5Bad with 0 stars based on rating
Motor Trend Overall Rating4/5
Side ProfileSide Profile
Driver/Passenger InteriorDriver/Passenger InteriorAverage with 2.5 stars based on ratings