Summary
vs. The Competition
The 2017 Jaguar F-Pace is currently rated #4 out of 4 overall in its category, beaten by the 2017 Acura RDX for Luxury Compact SUV Cars.
It's a bad car overall compared to others in the same category.
Its Driver/Passenger Interior lose against competitors.
Competitors
Which is better: Jaguar F-Pace or Acura RDX?
The F-Pace costs $6,320.00 more than the RDX. From comparing their attributes, our survey rated it is losing in a head to head match up.
Which is better: Jaguar F-Pace or BMW X3?
The F-Pace costs $1,940.00 more than the X3. You have a chance to be the first to compare the two against each other.
Which is better: Jaguar F-Pace or Porsche Macan?
The F-Pace costs $5,510.00 less than the Macan. You have a chance to be the first to compare the two against each other.
2017 Jaguar F-Pace Specs & Details
Is This Car Good?
Overall Rating
Best Attribute
Driver/Passenger Interior
Worst Attribute
Seating Capacity
| Rating | Feature | Value | Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $41,990.00 | Bad with 0 stars based on rating | |
| MPG | 18 city / 23 highway city / highway | Bad with 0 stars based on rating | |
| Drivetrain | AWD | Bad with 0 stars based on rating | |
| Horsepower | 180 to 380hp | ||
| Towing Capacity | 5,290 lbs | ||
| Cargo Volume | 33.5 cubic ft | ||
| Seating Capacity | 5. Comfortable and spacious. Not as much headroom as Posche Macan or BMW X5 | Bad with 0 stars based on rating | |
| Motor Trend Overall Rating | 4/5 | ||
| Side Profile |  | ||
| Driver/Passenger Interior |  | Average with 2.5 stars based on ratings |