The 2017 Nissan Murano is currently rated #4 out of 11 overall in its category, beaten by the 2017 Hyundai Santa Fe for Midsize SUV Cars.
It's a good car overall compared to others in the same category and beats more than half of its competition along the way.
Its Seating Capacity and MPG win versus competitors, but its Towing Capacity loses against the competition.
The Murano costs $4,140.00 more than the Sorento. Based on a comparison of the attributes, people rated it is losing in a head to head match up.
The Murano costs $1,005.00 less than the Pilot. After a comparison of the two based on their attributes, our voters rated it is losing in a head to head match up.
The Murano costs $1,060.00 less than the Santa Fe. After a comparison of the two based on their attributes, our voters rated it is winning in a head to head match up.
The Murano costs $790.00 more than the Edge. From comparing their attributes, our survey rated it is losing in a head to head match up.
The Murano costs $655.00 less than the Grand Cherokee. Based on a comparison of the attributes, people rated it is winning in a head to head match up.
The Murano costs $9,325.00 less than the Enclave. Based on a comparison of the attributes, people rated it is winning in a head to head match up.
The Murano costs $550.00 less than the Pathfinder. Based on a comparison of the attributes, people rated it is winning in a head to head match up.
The Murano costs $4,470.00 less than the 4Runner. After a comparison of the two based on their attributes, our voters rated it is losing in a head to head match up.
The Murano costs $890.00 less than the Highlander. From comparing their attributes, our survey rated it is winning in a head to head match up.
The Murano costs $1,920.00 less than the Explorer. From comparing their attributes, our survey rated it is winning in a head to head match up.
Rating | Feature | Value | Analysis |
---|---|---|---|
MSRP | $29,740.00 | Good with 3.5 stars based on ratings | |
MPG | 21 city / 28 highway city / highway | Good with 3.5 stars based on ratings | |
Drivetrain | FWD/AWD | Bad with 2 stars based on ratings | |
Horsepower | 260hp | Bad with 1.5 stars based on ratings | |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 19galgal | Bad with 2 stars based on ratings | |
Towing Capacity | 1,500 lbs | Bad with 0 stars based on ratings | |
Cargo Volume | 31.1cubic feet behind second row. 67 with seats folded | Average with 2.5 stars based on ratings | |
Seating Capacity | 5. Some of the best seats in its class | Good with 4 stars based on ratings | |
Motor Trend Overall Rating | 4/5 | Average with 2.5 stars based on ratings |