The 2017 Nissan Pathfinder is currently rated #6 out of 11 overall in its category, beaten by the 2017 Toyota 4Runner for Midsize SUV Cars.
It's an average car overall compared to others in the same category in spite of its low overall rating because its attributes individually tie against competition.
Specifically, its Towing Capacity and Cargo Volume tie against competitors.
The Pathfinder costs $4,690.00 more than the Sorento. From comparing their attributes, our survey rated it is losing in a head to head match up.
The Pathfinder costs $455.00 less than the Pilot. Based on a comparison of the attributes, people rated both as tied in a head to head match up.
The Pathfinder costs $510.00 less than the Santa Fe. After a comparison of the two based on their attributes, our voters rated it is winning in a head to head match up.
The Pathfinder costs $1,340.00 more than the Edge. From comparing their attributes, our survey rated both as tied in a head to head match up.
The Pathfinder costs $550.00 more than the Murano. After a comparison of the two based on their attributes, our voters rated it is losing in a head to head match up.
The Pathfinder costs $105.00 less than the Grand Cherokee. After a comparison of the two based on their attributes, our voters rated it is winning in a head to head match up.
The Pathfinder costs $8,775.00 less than the Enclave. After a comparison of the two based on their attributes, our voters rated it is losing in a head to head match up.
The Pathfinder costs $3,920.00 less than the 4Runner. After a comparison of the two based on their attributes, our voters rated it is winning in a head to head match up.
The Pathfinder costs $340.00 less than the Highlander. After a comparison of the two based on their attributes, our voters rated it is winning in a head to head match up.
The Pathfinder costs $1,370.00 less than the Explorer. Based on a comparison of the attributes, people rated it is winning in a head to head match up.
Rating | Feature | Value | Analysis |
---|---|---|---|
MSRP | $30,290.00 | Good with 3.5 stars based on ratings | |
MPG | 20 city / 27 highway city / highway | Average with 2.5 stars based on ratings | |
Drivetrain | FWD/4WD | Good with 3 stars based on ratings | |
Horsepower | 284hp | Bad with 2 stars based on ratings | |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 19.5galgal | Bad with 0 stars based on ratings | |
Towing Capacity | 6,000 lbs | Good with 5 stars based on ratings | |
Cargo Volume | 16cubic feet behind third row. 47.8 behind second, and 79.8 2nd and third row flat. | Bad with 0 stars based on ratings | |
Seating Capacity | 7. Seats have good space in 3 rows, but they are too firm. | Bad with 2 stars based on ratings | |
Motor Trend Overall Rating | 3.5/5 |