The 2017 Nissan Rogue is currently rated #8 out of 12 overall in its category, beaten by the 2017 GMC Terrain for Compact SUV Cars.
It's a bad car overall compared to others in the same category.
Its Seating Capacity lose against competitors.
The Rogue costs $1,090.00 less than the RAV4. After a comparison of the two based on their attributes, our voters rated it is winning in a head to head match up.
The Rogue costs $70.00 more than the Escape. You have a chance to be the first to compare the two against each other.
The Rogue costs $720.00 more than the Equinox. You have a chance to be the first to compare the two against each other.
The Rogue costs $1,225.00 more than the Forester. After a comparison of the two based on their attributes, our voters rated it is losing in a head to head match up.
The Rogue costs $620.00 more than the Sportage. You have a chance to be the first to compare the two against each other.
The Rogue costs $250.00 less than the Terrain. You have a chance to be the first to compare the two against each other.
The Rogue costs $1,120.00 more than the Tucson. You have a chance to be the first to compare the two against each other.
The Rogue costs $225.00 less than the CX-5. From comparing their attributes, our survey rated both as tied in a head to head match up.
The Rogue costs $225.00 less than the CR-V. Based on a comparison of the attributes, people rated it is losing in a head to head match up.
The Rogue costs $2,125.00 more than the Crosstrek. You have a chance to be the first to compare the two against each other.
The Rogue costs $5,780.00 more than the Patriot. Based on a comparison of the attributes, people rated it is winning in a head to head match up.
Rating | Feature | Value | Analysis |
---|---|---|---|
MSRP | $23,820.00 | Average with 2.5 stars based on ratings | |
MPG | 26 city / 33 highway city / highway | Average with 2.5 stars based on ratings | |
Drivetrain | FWD/AWD | Bad with 0 stars based on ratings | |
Horsepower | 170hp | Bad with 1 stars based on ratings | |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 14.5 galgal | Bad with 2 stars based on ratings | |
Cargo Volume | 39.3cubic ft w/ seats in use, 70 w/o | Good with 3 stars based on ratings | |
Seating Capacity | 5. S and SV Models fit 7. Seats good, 3rd row is standout | Good with 4 stars based on ratings | |
Motor Trend Overall Rating | 3.5/5 | Good with 3.5 stars based on ratings |